Home | Publications| The Book | Online Newspaper | Links | Contact Us




UK Rights - The Online newspaper of UKCHR

News and Comment

(This page is currently under development)

THE COMMISSION FOR RACIAL EQUALITY INVESTIGATION into Sheffield Medical School

Concern was expressed about the failure rate of ethnic minority students in October 1997.

In fairness it must be emphasised that it is always, without exception, in the interest of the university that students should pass exams. People who engage in discriminatory practices are contravening the interests of the university and add to the workload of their colleagues. Unfortunately the link between knowledge and behaviour is not always so obvious. If it were so, then no person would ever smoke, take drugs etc.

A local MP, Mr. Richard Allan, MP for Sheffield Hallam made representations after someone made enquiries. The MP wrote to Mr. Page, the Undergraduate Dean of this University's medical school on 21/10/97. The informant was concerned about the anonymous marking system adopted by the University in 1994. The MP said in his letter that it was alleged that the names of the students were in fact easily identifiable to those doing the marking. There was a suggestion that there was a list of names against the numbers used on exam papers which was known to be available to course tutors. It was further alleged that this had led to a racial bias creeping into the marking whereby a higher proportion of ethnic minority students was failing than would be statistically normal.

The informant gave the official fail lists to the MP. In the 5th year of the 1996/97 session group of medical student's 27/181 students were of home ethnic origin. Almost exactly 15% In this medical school at the time there were three subjects taught in rotation. They are Obstetrics and Gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry. Among all those who failed Obstetrics and Gynaecology in that year 7/18 that failed were of ethnic minority. The exam consisted of 25% attachment marks, 12.5% coursework 25% essays and 37.5% Objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) In the OSCE candidates were given a two-digit candidate number to put on their papers. The list of names and numbers was put on a notice board for all to see. On essay papers at Sheffield University there is a confidentiality flap which is very difficult to seal down. Candidates have to write their names underneath the flap. Although there is nothing to stop a student sealing down the flap with sello-tape or stapling it down.

In Paediatrics 5/7 that failed were of ethnic minority. Paediatrics was, under that system 50% continuos assessment, 25% OSCE and 25% clinical exam. If the candidate failed the clinical exam it resulted in an outright fail. In psychiatry 5/12 that failed were of ethnic origin. This exam consisted of a clinical exam, a written paper and an attachment. Dr. Peters would openly admit to having the list of names and numbers before the papers were marked and insist that the students wrote their names on the papers. Of the students who had to drop down a year into this group of students due to exam failure seven were of ethnic minority. Six were in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

In Mr. Page's reply of 23 October 1998 he said "The Medical School adheres to this policy. However the system cannot guarantee complete anonymity as the identifier of an individual student is the student registration number, access to which is available to nearly every department in the University, via the Management and Administrative computer. Internal examiners do not receive the list of names corresponding to student registration number." Clearly if the allegations regarding the Dr. Peters were true then Mr. Page was not telling the MP the truth. Mr. Page went on to say "any academic member of staff with a will to identify the name of an individual form their registration number could do so but when faced with having to mark nearly 200 or so scripts to a tight deadline would waste time doing so." He did not mention the confidentiality flap nor the fact that not every examiner would mark 200 scripts. The question is what about students on courses where there are not so many students? On top of that what about resits where there are very few students?

"Project work submitted for assessment in the first two years of the course uses student registration number as an identifier." In theory, it has been known that such work is done by name, but the work is handed back to the student once marked. "In the latter stages of the course, assessment includes clinical and oral examinations, which are obviously conducted face to face and cannot be anonymous. Individual examiner biasing the whole assessment is minimal. These safeguards are threefold:

1) A range of assessment at each level of the course ensures that a number of examiners would be responsible for assessing each candidate, with each component of the examination often having a different set of examiners.

2) Clinical and oral examinations are conducted by examining pairs, with each examiner marking independently of the other before arriving at an agreed mark.

3) The External Examiner is present to moderate marks and to ensure standards are comparable with other medical schools." As far as the failure rate of ethnic minority students was concerned he said:

"I am unable to comment on the failure rate of any particular group of students. The school does not routinely monitor failure rates based on race, nationality, ethnic origin or gender but believes the above procedures should ensure that racial bias does not occur."

The MP was not satisfied and wrote back to Mr. Page on 21/11/97. He said "I feel that the introduction of a secure system of student identification for closed book examinations and routine monitoring of failure rates would help the University in responding to allegations of bias." Catherine Davison a senior member of staff of the Medical School replied on 26/11/97. In her letter she stated that she had passed on the letter to the University Teaching Committee, To date there has been no reply. This made the press in one of the local papers on 26/11/97. On 28/11/97 the then academic and welfare secretary of the Student Union wrote to Professor Woods, the Dean of the Faculty of Medicine about this article. She expressed concern that "It was alleged in this article that the University's policy on anonymous marking was not being fully implemented by your faculty. I am also aware that discrepancies following the procedure were acknowledged by the faculty during a student review hearing at which a member of the Unions Student Advice Centre was present representing a student."

The academic and welfare secretary was also concerned by the allegations of racial bias against students from ethnic minorities. She said "Could you please send me any statistics on failure rates, compared to the intake of ethnic minority students and could you let me know what monitoring is carried out by your faculty? I would also be grateful if you could send me a written assurance that the Medical Faculty is abiding by the University's anonymous marking policy."

Professor Woods replied on 17/12/97. He said "I know of ONE instance where an ambiguous statement made by a lecturer led to confusion in the minds of the students sitting an examination. It is wrong to extrapolate from this single episode to a general statement that the Faculty as a whole has not implemented the University policy on anonymous marking. At the Faculty Student Review Committee, to which you refer, the Committee did acknowledge that a discrepancy had occurred on one occasion but this was not done with any intention to identify individuals and it was understood that the marking of the examination was conducted fairly and without bias, in accordance with the Departments usual practice." If they have been caught once how many times have they done it?

Professor Woods did not send the academic and welfare secretary any failure lists nor a written assurance that the medical faculty was abiding by the anonymous marking policy. The student union has confirmed that the department concerned was the department of psychiatry. As far as monitoring was concerned he said "I am unable to answer your general allegation about racial bias in examination within the Faculty of Medicine. As you should know, and in accordance with the University Equal opportunities Policy, the Faculty does not record, nor have access to, details of ethnic origin of individual students. We are therefore unable to monitor failure rates based on ethnic origin."

However he obviously took the letter from the Academic and Welfare Secretary seriously. He sent courtesy copies of his reply to The Registrar of the University, Mr. Page, Professor Sharp (Dean of the medical school) and Hilary Shenton. (The Senior administrative member of staff at the medical school.) It is also interesting to note that the new course handbook also makes a statement on equal opportunities.

All this material was passed onto the Commission for Racial Equality. In their letter of 2 February 1998 to the informant they stated that "in the case of Obstetrics and Gynaecology exams and the Paediatrics results the disproportionate impact of the failure rate on ethnic minority students seems to be a real cause for concern." They commented on the response of the Mr Page's reply to the MP. "He states that the medical school does not monitor failure rates but seems to have a belief, (possibly divine) that their procedures are free and fair from racial bias. Given that the University must be aware of the concerns in their exams and their apparent commitment to a programme of action to make their comprehensive equal opportunities policy effective" it seems strange that they have not decided neither to monitor the situation or take any action as a result..

"It would seem useful for the Commission to raise its concerns about these issues with the University and possibly investigate the medical schools examination system in particular."

The CRE agreed with the informant that three things were clear: 1) The University was clearly not following its own rules. 2) The University procedures were clearly inadequate. 3) The University was bound by it's own equal opportunities policy to do something about the problem. The CRE said that they had heard the same thing from other students before, which is no such discrimination, has EVER been alleged in the pre-clinical part of the medical course. It is in the clinical part of the course that such acts occur. In July 1998 after much liasing between the CRE and the University, the CRE confirmed that the University agreed to monitor failure rates by ethnic origin as of the 1998/99 academic year in all courses. However who is doing the monitoring? Dr. Peters, the department of paediatrics or obstetrics and gynaecology? However the University have made another step to make sure this cannot happen again. The results are now put up in a lockable glass cabinet where nobody can take them down again.

Despite that in December 1999 the then Dean of the Faculty of Medicine Professor A. P. Weetman wrote an article in Student BMJ arguing why students should NOT have their papers back once marked.

UNITED NATIONS SLAMS BRITAIN AGAIN, AND AGAIN

The United Nations'Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination criticised Britain for failing to rid itself of racism. British Home Secretary, Jack ("the last") Straw is upset! Meanwhile, a survey found that Britain's racial minorities felt that "much of their potential remained untapped".

UNITED NATIONS SLAMS BRITAIN'S HUMAN RIGHTS RECORD. A devastating United Nations report has condemned the UK's human rights record and called for sweeping reforms to the secret security services, an end to gagging orders and protection for journalists who expose wrong-doing inside the secret and unaccountable MI5 and MI6 intelligence services. The report from a UN special rapporteur, Abid Hussein, calls for the repeal of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, and sweeping changes to the Official Secrets Act and the freedom of information and regulation of investigatory powers bills going through Parliament. It also wants a reform of the defamation and obscenity laws.

WESTERN ALLIES BLAMED FOR GENOCIDE. An international panel commissioned by the Orgaisation for African Unity to investigate the 1994 genocide in Rwanda issued its findings in 'Rwanda: The Preventable Genocide', placing the brunt of the blame on the UN Security Council, the United States, France and Belgium for their failure to prevent the massacres. The report was welcomed by the UN Secretary-General, who hoped it would make an effective contribution to grapple with the complex challenges of preventing genocide.

COMMENT - CRIPPLING THE RACIAL MINORITY COMMUNITIES - REPORT ON RACISM FROM THE HEART OF LONDON'S EAST END

THE SYSTEM FOR CHOOSING JUDGES AND QUEEN'S COUNSELS is riddled with indirect race and sex discrimination, according to a report carried out for the Lord Chancellor's Department.

ALLOCATION OF PERFORMANCE PAY IN THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE is riddled with racism, according to a survey published by the health union MSF.

BRITAIN SHAMED BY UNICEF OVER CHILD POVERTY

Britain has one of the worst records on childhood poverty in the industrialised world, according to a damning United Nations (UNICEF) report. The report says the British figure is worse than the rates for Turkey, Poland and Hungary, which suffer less relative poverty. Of 23 countries surveyed, only Italy, the United States and Mexico have a worse record. The report accuses Britain of failing on five key indicators. In addition to the high rate of child poverty, these are the high numbers of lone-parent families suffering from poverty; workless households; people on low wages; and people on low benefits.

UNICEF says that nearly 20% of young Britons - between 3 million and 4 million children - live in families that are below the official poverty line, judged as household income of less than half median earnings. That compares with 2.6% in Sweden and 3.9% in Norway.

IMPERIALISM, THE ANGLICAN CHURCH, CHILD ABUSE AND ARSE MONEY

The Anglican Church of Canada is braced for brankruptcy, submerged by claims for damages, for the alleged sexual abuse of native Canadians in its children's homes, amounting to $1.3 billion.

The revelations of the spartan and loveless conditions in the homes, and the traumas suffered by the children who were forced into them mirror similar allegations involving schools and homes run by churches across the world, from Ireland to Australia.

The Canadian Anglican Journal, which carried a long report last month, on the church's culpability, quoted one of the first native Canadians to receive a financial settlement, Ben Pratt of the Gordon Indian Reserve at Punnichy, in Saskatchewan. Mr Pratt said: "It is not like the money will make me happpy or make me feel better, but I might as well get something for what those bastards did to me. Around here it is called arse money.....it is supposed to be dirty".

Mr Pratt is said to have received $31,000 compensation for being repeatedly raped from the age of seven by William Starr, director of the residential home on the reservation in the 1960s, and later administrator of the school. About 7,000 Indians have lodged cases, mostly against the government.

THE GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR in Britain continued to grow through the 1990s, according to a report of the Office of National Statistics. In April 1998, about three million children were living below the poverty line in families with incomes of less than 60% of the median income.

STRONG EVIDENCE OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM EXISTS IN THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE, an independent inquiry has concluded. Meanwhile, the EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS HAS RULED THAT AN ASIAN MAN accused of fraud was denied a fair trial when the judge at Birmingham crown court allowed the jury to continue hearing the case after a juror complained of racist comments by fellow jurors.

RECORDED RACIAL CRIME HAS RISEN DRAMATICALLY in the past year, Scotland Yard has said. Eight out of ten racial incidents were unsolved. Other studies have suggested that racial crime is vastly under-reported, with police being told of only one in twenty incidents.

NEW BRITISH EMPIRE OF THE DAMMED

Bolivia's water is the latest acquisition of UK firms in the service of Uncle Sam. The new owners of the water system, International Waters Ltd. of London, IWL, is controlled by a larger US corporation, Bechtel. IWL has not put any funds into the water projects. Water prices could rise by 150%.

In Buenos Aires, the region's first water privatisation consortium made 7,500 workers redundant, whereupon the system bled from lack of maintenance, and prices jumped. The new owners of the Buenos Aires system include Anglian Water.

Britain is re-establishing imperial reach through rapid low-capital takeovers of former state assets, concentrated in infrastructure where monopoly capital virtually guarantees an outsized profit. It all seemed a risk-free romp - until a few thirsty, angry peasants decided that they could stop it.

SCANDAL OF THOUSANDS ABUSED IN CHILDREN'S HOMES

Police are investigating what could be one of Britain's biggest child abuse scandals involving as many as 20,000 children in council care. At the Bristol homes, police found a disturbing pattern of abuse. Many of the suspected victims were boys and girls who passed through the centres before moving back home, to foster homes or another institution.

Furthermore, a £13.5 million inquiry has revealed how thousands of children in public care in Wales were abandoned to years of sexual, physical and emotional abuse. The Welsh Secretary told Parliament that the report by Sir Ronald Waterhouse, a former High Court judge, catalogued "deeds of appalling mistreatment" in children's homes in north Wales. The 937-page report, 'Lost in Care', published after a three-year inquiry described "a harsh institutional regime in which, for many, there was a heavy atmosphere of fear.....for many children who were consigned to [one home], in the 10 or so years of its existence as a community home, it was a form of purgatory or worse from which they emerged more damaged than when they had entered, and for whom the future had become even more bleak".

CAGE-BASED SOCIAL CONTROL IN BRITAIN

New Home Office statistics show that courts in England and Wales are among the toughest in western Europe. Only Portugal hands down longer jail sentences.

The prison population in England and Wales is 68,000, or 126 inmates per 100,000 poplation - again second only to Portugal in western Europe. Proportionately more people are jailed in England and Wales than in Sudan, Saudi Arabia or China. In world terms the figure compares with 690 per 100,000 in Russia, 668 inmates per 100,000 in the United States and 215 per 100,000 in the Czech Republic.

The Home Office said 1998 figures from 29 countries showed that while crime rose by 5% across the industrialised world, it fell by 1% in England and Wales. In Scotland it rose by 3%, and in Northern Ireland by 28% (to 76,664 offences), second behind South Africa (37%).

OLD BOYS NETWORK SURVIVES IN THE APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES

A watchdog to oversee the apppointment of judges was announced by the Lord Chancellor, prompting fury from legal groups who accused him of missing an opportunity for a radical shake-up of the controversial "secret soundings" system.

The current process, which relies on confidential assessments of candidates by judges and senior legal figures is widely seen as unfair by lawyers. The president of the Law Society said, "An old boys' network which uses flawed criteria to select judges will be replaced by an old boys' network which uses slightly better criteria".

Several high-level committees have recommended an independent appointments committee as operates in the U.S. and many other European countries. In Britain there are no black or Asian high court judges, and only 42 women among the 534 full-time judges in England and Wales, 70% of whom were educated in fee-paying schools.

CHILDREN'S RIGHTS

Britain is the worst country in the European Union in which to be a child, according to a study by UNICEF for the Institute of Public Policy Research. The United Kingdom comes out bottom of the table out of the 15 countries on three of the seven indicators of child poverty, and below average on two others.

BANANA REPUBLIC OR CIVILISED DEMOCRACY?

The UK government wants to prosecute Martin Ingram, a former member of the army's force research unit - a covert arm of military intelligence - who has made allegations about attempts to sabotage an inquiry by Sir John Stevens, the Metropolitan poice commissioner, into collaboration between the army and loyalists in Northern Ireland.

The Defence Secretary, Geoffrey Hoon, has obtained an injunction preventing newspapers from reporting further revelations by Mr Ingram.

Sir John has reportedly ordered an investigation into allegations that the unit burgled and burnt down his offices, to destroy evidence. Jane Winter, director of British Irish Watch, said that if the allegations about army involvement in the arson were true," then that is more reminiscent of a banana republic than a civilised democracy".

CONTINUED EROSION OF CIVIL RIGHTS

Although section 16a of the Prevention of Terrorism Act was described a year ago by Lord Bingham, the Lord Chief Justice, as undermining "in a blatant and obvious way, the presumption of of innocence ",almost identical clauses appear in a new anti-terrorism bill now before Parliament.

JUSTICE SYSTEM RIDDLED WITH RACISM

Every key stage of the British criminal justice system is riddled with racism, according to a study by the Howard League penal reform group. It says that British Afro-Caribbean people are seven times more likely to be in jail even though they are no more likely to commit crimes.

FURTHER ASSAULTS ON VULNERABLE CHILDREN

The processing of women asylum seekers caught begging with their children is to be fast-tracked, and those who fail to qualify for refugee status will be removed from Britain, under plans being considered by the Home Office.

PARENTS MAY BE JAILED

Parents could be jailed for three months and face £2,500 fines for failing to make their truant children attend school, under new powers in the Criminal Justice and Court Services Bill published last week.

COMMENT - REPORT ON RACISM FROM THE HEART OF LONDON'S EAST END - TOWER HAMLETS RACE EQUALITY COUNCIL'S ANNUAL REPORT

1998 has been another year of heartbreak and heartache for the racial minorities. Atavistic and unsalubrious practices from other eras and other lands, from the theories and practices of apartheid, fascism (both of the right as well as of the left) and colonialism have now taken root in the political culture of the metropolitan heartland. Some of our children have died from racial violence on the streets of the capital. Others are being "educated", if indeed that can be called "education", in sink schools in dilapidated areas in the inner city. Our womenfolk are being denied access to their traditional areas of training and employment in the nursing and teaching professions. The sick, for example, the diabetics, the disease itself often a consequence of stress, are frequently inadequately treated, as they await a premature death.

The exclusion of minorities from participation in the National Health Service and the teaching profession, for example, prevents the communities from fostering a positive culture and knowledge of health and healing, and of education and care. Furthermore, there has been a targeting and destruction of intellectuals and professionals, of those who are most useful to their communities, this, again, a not uncommon practice amongst authoritarian states. In Tower Hamlets, we live and work in the very birthplace of racism and fascism, these now having, seemingly, taken on different and respectable guises and operating from positions of influence.

In summary, there has been a wanton destruction of the human and material resources of the racial minority communities through the policy and practice of enforced racial deprivation. If Rudy Narayan, the eminent racial minority barrister had been allowed to continue to practise his profession, many a venomous thug would have received his comeuppence and landed in prison. Of course, the state has no intention of letting justice prevail, in these matters at least. On the other hand, the British South African legal practice of invoking the "common purpose" provisions of the criminal code was utilised to convict an innocent young Bangladeshi in Somers Town, Kings Cross for a murder he did not commit; and so young Miah languishes in prison on a life sentence, whilst society moves on unconcerned.

Finally, let us quote from the German theologian and Bishop of the German Reformed Church, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who died in 1944, a prisoner of the National Socialist government of the Third Reich. "First they (the National Socialists) came for the communists, but I did nothing because I was not a communist. Then they came for the socialists, but I did nothing because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, but I did nothing because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the racial minorities, but I did nothing because I did not belong to the racial minorities. Finally, they came for me, but there was, by then, no one who could help me".

  
2005 © Copyright ukcouncilhumanrights